/
Use of Metadata Standards
Use of Metadata Standards
Background
The use of metadata has been raised several time during the project and since this project is about Linked Open Data, we will definitely come to using one or more standards.
The aim of this discussion is
- to identify suitable metadata standards
- decide in which part of the system / for which objects a certain standard should be used
1 Metadata Standards
Name | URL | Comments |
---|---|---|
Schema.org | http://schema.org |
|
Dublin Core | http://dublincore.org/ |
|
FOAF (Friend of a Friend) | http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/ |
|
SIOC | http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/ |
|
DOAP | https://github.com/ewilderj/doap/wiki |
|
LOM (IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata) | https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1484.12.1-2002.html |
|
2 Application of Metadata Standards
Dublin Core
Since DC is for describing the properties of a document or resource (such as title, author, dateAccepted, relates) it seems to be a good standard for describing our Decks (and Slides).
Schema.org
Since Schema.org aims to provide a general purpose (can one call it world-knowledge) vocabulary it seems to be a good standard for describing the contents of Slides.
Metadata can also help Accessibility
See https://slidewiki.atlassian.net/wiki/x/I4Aa
Related: Semantic representation
, multiple selections available,
Related content
Design options and decisions: Technical Implementation of Semantic representation
Design options and decisions: Technical Implementation of Semantic representation
More like this
Data Models
Data Models
More like this
Suitable ontologies (educational, accessibility) for slide annotation
Suitable ontologies (educational, accessibility) for slide annotation
More like this
Versioning
Versioning
More like this
Trial requirements from April 2017 Plenary (RQM - ReQuirement Madrid)
Trial requirements from April 2017 Plenary (RQM - ReQuirement Madrid)
More like this
Semantic representation
Semantic representation
More like this