Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 3 Next »


Date
Participants

Retrospective


What did we do well?

Process

  • Incremental improvements of the features
  • Deployment has been improved as a tool and process

People

  • A good teamwork atmosphere
  • Work well as a team
  • Open-minded team

Communication & tools

  • Communication tools and process
  • Very good infrastructure for development
  • Project review meetings
  • Conversational tone/politeness in communication
  • Themed (seasonally or otherwise) developer meetings
  • Linux is great

Goal/Focus

  • Presentation rooms are really cool


What should we have done better?

Process

  • Not many people in Front-end (slide editor) + back-end systems integration.
  • It is hardest now to make progress + time for planning as SlideWiki has become more complex
  • Having a procedure for situations when there are no volunteers for a certian task (ticket)
  • 1 month sprints too long - we should be able to better PLAN then → what's in gets done
  • Ensure QA before merge
  • Please test you code!

Goal/Focus

  • More focus on graphic design rather than accessibility
  • Responsive interface for mobile devices
  • More research work
  • More semantics to be implemented

Communication & tools

  • Information at too many different places (Google-Doc, Confluence, JIRA, Slack)
  • Hard to know who to contact about specific parts of the codebase
  • Linux is great



Suggested Improvements retrospective participants

Communication

  • Documentation
  • Changelogs / release notes for releases
  • Demo during dev telco

Process

  • Time for planning + design
  • Proportionally split responsibilities for open tasks (e.g., performance)
  • A clear process for updating/synchronizing our different servers
  • Database maintenance - fix schema + data changes
  • Tests everywhere

Goal/focus

  •  More focus on core functionality to encourage users
  • Have proper roadmap
  • More research/publications
  • more stand-alone applications built on top of services

People

  • Become creative

Tools

  • Backup & reliability of the servers




Actions

  • Documentation


Actions after retrospective hackathon V3 Amsterdam

  • No labels