Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

State of the art

Relevant papers (2016)

    •              
                                      Matching model. 
                 
                                          Method for matching functional capability with content type and content feature. Notice that there is a cognition abilities

    • [2] Elias M. et al., "Matching Learning Material to People with Disabilities based on Competence and Functional Capability", in proc. Educational Knowledge Management (EKM) 2016. Link.

                      
                            Excerpt from the ACCESSIBLE ontology.

Specific ontologies

    • Paper [1] mentions these ontologies for learning resources (material in e-learning): Dublin Core, IEEE LOM (Learning Object Metadata), SCORM (Shareable Content Object Reference Model).
    • Paper [2] mentions these ontologies: ACCESSIBLE (learner profiles in Open Courseware contexts and accessibility aspects), a new ontology (with no name) extends ACCESSIBLE to include accessibility specifications from IMS Global Learning Consortium. The IMS Learner Information Package (LIP) specification includes a category for accessibility aspects, described in detail in the IMS Access For All (IMS AfA) specification (as far as I know this is XML, that is, is not ontologized).
    • Ontologies ADOOLES and ADOLENA can be taken into account for reuse
          - http://julius.nganji.com/docs/ontodaps-cwis.pdf
          - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.11120/ital.2011.10010001



  • No labels