Technical Implementation of Semantic representation

Goal: decide on implementation

1. How will we implement tags?
   
   • Option 1:As plain text that is appended to slide revisions and decks (e.g. tags: [mathematics, fibonacci, ...] or
     
     • Pros:
     • Cons:
   • Option 2: as URIs that are already linked to further knowledge (RDF)?
     • Pros:
     • Cons:
   • Other options? (Ali KhaliliRoy MeissnerMariano RicoAntje SchlafLuis )
     
     
2. How do we save these tags?
   
   • Option 1 - As part of the slide model in the MongoDB or
     
     • Pros:
     • Cons:
   • Option 2 - as a separate DB (e.g. a Graph DB - read next section)
     • Pros:
     • Cons:
   • Other options? (Ali KhaliliRoy MeissnerMariano RicoAntje SchlafLuis )
   • Related:
     
     • RML - http://rml.io/
     • Karma - https://usc-isi-i2.github.io/karma/
     • SparqlMap - https://github.com/tomatophantastico/sparqlmap/
     • morph-xr2rml - https://github.com/frmichel/morph-xr2rml
       
       
3. How do we realize semi-automatic semantic annotation of decks and slides?

• • Option 2 - Use LD-R semi-automatic annotating feature (API?) (Ali Khalili
    • Pros:
    • Cons:
  • Option 3 - Implement our own function/service?
    • Pros:
    • Cons: Possibly takes more time? Reuse existing libraries?
  • Other options? (Roy MeissnerMariano RicoAntje SchlafLuis Daniel Fernandes Rotger )
  •