Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Goal: decide on implementation

  1. How will we implement tags?
    • Option 1:As plain text that is appended to slide revisions and decks (e.g. tags: [mathematics, fibonacci, ...] or
      • Pros: easy to implement
      • Cons: 
    • Option 2: as URIs that are already linked to further knowledge (RDF)?
      • Pros: we might be able to infer knowledge from the WWW, we might be able to present a user enriched recommendations
      • Cons: we might not be able to link to distinct topics/concepts in case we are unsure about the meaning of a tag
    • Other options? (Ali Khalili , Roy Meissner  , Mariano Rico , Antje Schlaf , Luis Daniel Fernandes Rotger )
  2. How do we save these tags?
  3. How do we realize semi-automatic semantic annotation of decks and slides?






  • No labels