Part 1. Compare the revisions, showing which parts of slides were authored by which users. Related to
| Jira Legacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jira Legacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 2. Counting the user contribution to slides and decks. Related to
| Jira Legacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 3. Count the user reputation based on its contribution to liked slides and decks
...
Simple case: slides
UPD: we do not give point on reuse. As this is a back-door - you can create a fake account and reuse your slides 100 times. The same for decks. No points for reuse (r very small, symbolical amount). The users still benefir from the reuse of their content - as if a slide is reused in many good decks, its chances to be liked increase)
Simple case: decks
When a deck was liked or reused - we calculate the contribution at that exact moment and add points to the collaborators. The deck can also be disliked (or "do not like it anymore" button was clicked) - in developmentthis does not influence the rating of collaborators, only the rating of deck itself (do not want mad students avenge their professors, and impossible to calculate). Important issue: if a user clicked "like" the second time - it should not add points (otherwise one can click "like" - "do not like anymore" in a sequence and increase the rating infinitely)
Similar to slides, no points for reuse, only for likes.
Translation activity: in development
Part 4. Introduce a concept of Patron (deck was authored in slidewiki by darya, but Darya is a PhD student of Soeren - he also has to get points for the deck, because...because this is life=) - in development
Example 1. Soeren creates his slides by himself, Ali and Klaas help him.
...